2007/7/16, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com:
On 16/07/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
And whilst I do accept this isn't "about Danny", perhaps you will pardon this note: 29.2% of the community who registered an opinion thought that an outspoken ex-employee was worthy of a seat on the board. We appointed people on 30.1%. On the whole, the difference in votes between Frieda, Oscar, Michael and Danny was in the noise - it was virtually chance deciding which one of them won. There isn't overwhelming support there, but neither is there any kind of deep distrust.
Yes. And in fact the diffrences of the numbers of votes for Dany (no. 6) and Frieda (no. 3) is just 37 votes. It is just 0.88% of all votes... I personally have a feeling that it was just a matter of luck who won the election for 3rd possiton. The difference between Oscar and Frieda is just 20 votes - it is less than 0.5% of votes...