2007/7/16, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 16/07/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>
wrote:
And whilst I do accept this isn't "about
Danny", perhaps you will
pardon this note: 29.2% of the community who registered an opinion
thought that an outspoken ex-employee was worthy of a seat on the
board. We appointed people on 30.1%. On the whole, the difference in
votes between Frieda, Oscar, Michael and Danny was in the noise - it
was virtually chance deciding which one of them won. There isn't
overwhelming support there, but neither is there any kind of deep
distrust.
Yes. And in fact the diffrences of the numbers of votes for Dany (no.
6) and Frieda (no. 3) is just 37 votes. It is just 0.88% of all
votes... I personally have a feeling that it was just a matter of luck
who won the election for 3rd possiton. The difference between Oscar
and Frieda is just 20 votes - it is less than 0.5% of votes...
--
Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.poli.toya.net.pl
http://www.ptchem.lodz.pl/en/TomaszGanicz.html