On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:20 PM, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:14 PM, geni
<geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2008/6/4 Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>om>:
(and the licensing concerns that
go along with that - I doubt anyone can say with absolute certainty
whether such usurpation is even legal,
It probably isn't:
I. Preserve the section Entitled "History", Preserve its Title, and
add to it an item stating at least the title, year, new authors, and
publisher of the Modified Version as given on the Title Page. If there
is no section Entitled "History" in the Document, create one stating
the title, year, authors, and publisher of the Document as given on
its Title Page, then add an item describing the Modified Version as
stated in the previous sentence.
--
geni
My recollection (and it's been a year since I was head-down in the DB
tables, so it may be wrong) is that the Database stores all the
changes by user ID not username - so, if you change an IDs associated
name (the usurped account being renamed) then the ownership / change
history changes along with it transparently.
If that is not correct I apologize, but that's what I remember of it...
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l