http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2012/2012_02069.htm
Wikipedia is cited in footnote 3 to dissenting opinion (see the very
end of the decision). The majority opinion responds that "as of yet,
Wikipedia is not recognized source material for serious
jurisprudential analysis."
(Caution: the facts of the case are unpleasant.)
Newyorkbrad