While that's mildly amusing, I think it is in poor taste.
Were I to choose to highlight something from the stats it would be the participation from board and staff. I see Anthere and Mike Godwin high among the top posters, and for most of May I was able to keep up without ignoring too much stuff. My interpretation of that would be that we saw a far higher signal-to-noise ratio for the month.
Brian McNeil
-----Original Message----- From: foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Dalton Sent: 03 June 2008 15:17 To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters
On 02/06/2008, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
Milos Rancic 59 Anthony 56 Ray Saintonge 47 Thomas Dalton 47 White
Cat
46 GerardM 39 effe iets anders 39 Geoffrey Plourde 36 Mike Godwin
34
Anthere 32 Dan Rosenthal 31 Birgitte SB 29 Mark Williamson 27 Jesse Plamondon-Willard 27 Pharos 25 David Gerard 23 Chad 23 Casey Brown 21 Michael Bimmler 20 Nathan 18
Wow, I am the first :) And I don't think that I raise the number of my emails... Oh, I see. Competition is not so strong anymore ;) With this amount of emails, I would be seventh for April :)
I don't remember any major scandals in May - there was nothing much to talk about. There needs to be some disagreement in order to get lots of back-and-forth. Everyone agreeing that we're all very grateful for the excellent job Florence did as board chair doesn't make for a lengthy debate! Now, had she done a bad job, we could have had a brilliant discussion about it. So basically, you should blame Florence! ;)
_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l