While that's mildly amusing, I think it is in poor taste.
Were I to choose to highlight something from the stats it would be the
participation from board and staff. I see Anthere and Mike Godwin high among
the top posters, and for most of May I was able to keep up without ignoring
too much stuff. My interpretation of that would be that we saw a far higher
signal-to-noise ratio for the month.
Brian McNeil
-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Dalton
Sent: 03 June 2008 15:17
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters
On 02/06/2008, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Nathan
<nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Milos Rancic 59 Anthony 56 Ray Saintonge 47 Thomas Dalton 47 White
Cat
> 46 GerardM 39 effe iets anders 39 Geoffrey
Plourde 36 Mike Godwin
34
Anthere 32
Dan Rosenthal 31 Birgitte SB 29 Mark Williamson 27 Jesse
Plamondon-Willard 27 Pharos 25 David Gerard 23 Chad 23 Casey Brown
21 Michael
Bimmler 20 Nathan 18
Wow, I am the first :) And I don't think that I raise the number of my
emails... Oh, I see. Competition is not so strong anymore ;) With this
amount of emails, I would be seventh for April :)
I don't remember any major scandals in May - there was nothing much to
talk about. There needs to be some disagreement in order to get lots
of back-and-forth. Everyone agreeing that we're all very grateful for
the excellent job Florence did as board chair doesn't make for a
lengthy debate! Now, had she done a bad job, we could have had a
brilliant discussion about it. So basically, you should blame
Florence! ;)
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l