Ilario Valdelli wrote:
I agree that we need more diversity, but in a world
based on
competition with a system of vote based on competition we cannot look
for more philanthropic aims.
It's hard to compete with The Will to Power. I think that there is an
underlying zeitgeist in favour of collaborative systems, but the
experience of that model on a wide scale is very limited. The path of
least resistance is to depend on familiar techniques; anything else
seems counterintuitive.
In a wikipedian structure based on freedom, opening and
participation
we are applying an anamorphic skeleton which has taking its own shape.
Our theories do favour freedom, but the greatest threat to that freedom
is the human tendency is to protect a fixed vision to the point of
stagnancy. In nature, the octopus is a great example of an animal that
has been successful without a skelton.
Ec