there is still the problem of the word "vandalism" I agree that it
sets up exactly the wrong expectations.
On 10/4/07, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/4/07, David Goodman <dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
reviewed or examined or checked would seem to be
the English idiom,
in any case, not sighted, But given the degree of scrutiny, I suppose
we want something much much weaker.
You could call it what it is: "unreviewed" and "reviewed for
vandalism". But there doesn't seem to be anything which is terse,
precise, and understandable to the layman.
I prefer a distinction like "published" and "draft": it's terse
and
instantly understandable but not very precise.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.