Becoming a Republic is not the same thing as leaving the Commonwealth.
India is still in the Commonwealth, for example.
Newyorkbrad
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:31 PM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2008/9/30 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
<cimonavaro(a)gmail.com>om>:
Heh. This does sort of make me interested in a further enquiry though...
Are all the countries which base their law on the english system still
members of the commonwealth?
No a bunch left when they became republics. India for example.
And no, this is not an idle question or asked
merely rhetorically. I
really don't know.
For that matter, could not, and did not some countries base their legal
system on the english laws, and never ever were members of the
kingdom/empire/commonwealth in the first place? I could easily imagine a
country devising a legal system modeled after the English legal
framework, which actually never came under the crown itself.
Technically the Philippines via the US. But much of what wasn't nabbed
by Britain was acquired by other Europeans or later the soviets. Not
sure what ethiopian law is based on these days.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l