Dear Sue,
I partially disagree with the statement "we're not in a position where we need to
make extraordinarily difficult choices about whether to preserve"
If you consider the WMF financial reserves it's true, but for what I understand, the
FDC should decide about the distribution of the forthcoming fundraising and so we can only
guess that the movement has no fundings problem. If this winter we cannot reach the total
amount fixed, what will happen? The entities that apply to the FDC will have to share the
money that remain after the WMF took a lot more than what is needed to operate the project
(bottom base).
I personnaly agree that the "core" should be more than only the basics, but
there should be something between this extremitiy and the actual WMF FDC proposal where
the community can comment only 10% of the real WMF budget.
What I could suggest is too split the WMF proposal in two parts: 1)the expanded core (high
priority) 2) the non core (lower priority=actual FDC proposal). In this case, if the
fundraising is not successful has intend, the cost of the difficult choices will be
assumed by all the part of the movement.
sincerely
Charles
___________________________________________________________
Charles ANDRES, Chairman
"Wikimedia CH" – Association for the advancement of free knowledge –
Le 8 oct. 2012 à 14:08, Sue Gardner <sgardner(a)wikimedia.org> a écrit :
On 8 October 2012 12:18, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It seems clear to me, based on the end result and
what foundation board and
senior staff have said, that they decided an account of money they wanted
to request from the FDC and then decided what to designate as non-core so
that it added up to that amount.
Rather disingenuous of them, but Sue has been very clear that she only sees
the foundation's application as a way of testing the process rather than as
actually being the right way to determine the budget.
On Oct 8, 2012 11:14 AM, "Itzik Edri" <itzik(a)infra.co.il> wrote:
Hi Thomas & Itzik,
There's FAQ material on the wikis about how core versus non-core were
determined -- I think it's part of the annual plan FAQ. (I'd link you
to it, but I'm in a bit of a rush. Maybe somebody else can point to
the right place?)
The Board and I had a number of discussions about core versus non-core
-- to very swiftly recap, we decided that we did not want core to mean
the rock-bottom base costs of operating the site. We realized that in
making that decision we'd risk being confusing, and that people would
likely end up sending inquiries like the one Itzik just sent, because
they'd likely be operating on the assumption that core did indeed mean
base costs. We considered whether to label it as something other than
"core" in order to avoid being confusing, but in the end went ahead
with core for lack of a better word.
Going from memory -- core is intended to represent the ordinary costs
of running the global sites -- so for example, it would include all
the costs of maintaining the trademark portfolio, providing legal
defence where necessary, doing media stuff and internal global
movement communications work, etc. For example we decided that
internationalization & localization are part of "core," because our
core work includes providing a service in multiple languages.
We did not want core to represent the base, rock-bottom,
non-negotiable costs of operating the sites on a shoestring, because
that's not the purpose of this exercise, because we're not in a
position where we need to make extraordinarily difficult choices about
whether to preserve, for example, internationalization & localization
versus site performance. If we were in that position (needing to make
very painful choices due to financial necessity) of course we would.
But that's not where we are.
Thomas, it's not actually true that I see this as purely an exercise
in testing the FDC process, although I do definitely think running
part of the WMF budget through the FDC will help us be sensitive to
fund-seeker needs as we iterate the process. I do also see value in
the process itself -- getting community input on the WMF's non-core
activities, etc., will be useful.
(Just FYI -- I won't be able to reply any more to this thread for much
of the rest of the day, by the way -- I'm swamped and doing a bunch of
things.)
Thanks,
Sue
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l