I agree that Wikipedia handles should join Mastodon. But, again, opening a social media channel needs a strategy. Currently, there's no strategy for the Twitter account, so opening an account in Mastodon without strategy would be a bad decision.
(Still waiting the social media team to define their monthly audience, really opaque statistics)
Best
Galder ________________________________ From: The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 1:33 AM To: Antoine Musso hashar@free.fr Cc: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Mozilla's social media pledge
No, I'm saying it is opaque who of the 41-member comms department at WMF edits Diff. Standard practice even for non-profit publications is for the masthead to be public.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, 11:34 AM Antoine Musso <hashar@free.frmailto:hashar@free.fr> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 9:06 PM geni <geniice@gmail.commailto:geniice@gmail.com <mailto:geniice@gmail.commailto:geniice@gmail.com>> wrote:
...
It has: https://diff.wikimedia.org/ <https://diff.wikimedia.org/>...
Le 03/01/2023 à 15:32, The Cunctator a écrit :
Pretty amusing that it's incredible opaque who edits it.
Hello The Cunctator,
I am assuming your reply was asking who can edit Diff. I don't think posts are editable in the sense of a Wiki. Proposing a content on Diff is open to anyone as long as it fit in its scope. There are more informations at:
* https://diff.wikimedia.org/about/ * https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Diff_(blog)
The blog is managed by the WMF Movement Communications team: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Movement_Communications who will assist in polishing up your draft blog post before it is published.
cheers,
-- Antoine "hashar" Musso Wikimedia Release Engineering