I agree that Wikipedia handles should join Mastodon. But, again, opening a social media
channel needs a strategy. Currently, there's no strategy for the Twitter account, so
opening an account in Mastodon without strategy would be a bad decision.
(Still waiting the social media team to define their monthly audience, really opaque
statistics)
Best
Galder
________________________________
From: The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 1:33 AM
To: Antoine Musso <hashar(a)free.fr>
Cc: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Mozilla's social media pledge
No, I'm saying it is opaque who of the 41-member comms department at WMF edits Diff.
Standard practice even for non-profit publications is for the masthead to be public.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, 11:34 AM Antoine Musso
<hashar@free.fr<mailto:hashar@free.fr>> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 9:06 PM geni
<geniice@gmail.com<mailto:geniice@gmail.com>
<mailto:geniice@gmail.com<mailto:geniice@gmail.com>>> wrote:
...
It has:
https://diff.wikimedia.org/ <https://diff.wikimedia.org/>
...
Le 03/01/2023 à 15:32, The Cunctator a écrit :
Pretty amusing that it's incredible opaque who
edits it.
Hello The Cunctator,
I am assuming your reply was asking who can edit Diff. I don't think
posts are editable in the sense of a Wiki. Proposing a content on Diff
is open to anyone as long as it fit in its scope. There are more
informations at:
*
https://diff.wikimedia.org/about/
*
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Diff_(blog)
The blog is managed by the WMF Movement Communications team:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Movement_Communications
who will assist in polishing up your draft blog post before it is published.
cheers,
--
Antoine "hashar" Musso
Wikimedia Release Engineering