Vous savez quoi? Allez tous vous faire foutre.
C'est facile de se moquer dans sa langue maternelle, de jouer sur les mots
et d'entourer ses insultes d'un joli emballage. Ça n'est pas vraiment ma
manière d'être, alors dans une langue étrangère...
C'est facile de venir taper sur Commons sur cette liste, mais quand on vous
met le nez dans votre merde, c'est une attaque...
Oui, la communauté de Commons n'est pas parfaite. En attendant, c'est 22
millions de fichiers libres qui sont à disposition, avec des personnes qui
travaillent pour produire ces images, les importer d'autres sources, les
catégoriser, etc. Pour le bien commun.
Si pour une fois, au lieu de pleurer parce que machin a été méchant en
proposant votre image à la suppression, vous proposiez des choses
constructives, des améliorations possibles du logiciel par exemple, ou une
façon de reconnaître le travail des wikifourmis qui catégorisent, corrigent
les descriptions, ... Mais il est plus facile de crier au loup. Et c'est
d'autant plus facile que ça vous permettra d'être bien vu.
Alors oui, vous pouvez tous aller vous faire foutre, avec vos
généralisations et vos insultes voilées.
Vous traduirez si vous le souhaitez, ou vous resterez confits dans vos
certitudes, je m'en fous.
Le ven. 12 déc. 2014 à 10:44, Craig Franklin <cfranklin(a)halonetwork.net> a
écrit :
Am I the only one that sees the irony in asking folks
not to pick on the
Commons community, then immediately asserting that enwp is the source of
all drama?
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 12/12/2014 4:56 PM, "Pipo Le Clown" <pleclown(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As you said, the first issue of Commons is
"demotivating contributors".
And
this thread is actually doing a good job at
it...
STOP the Commons bashing. Stop calling Commons contributors "anal
retentive" or "fussy neckbeards".
I'm an european. In Europe, one does not call another "nazi", as
Americans
do. It's insulting. Do you see people coming
to Wikimedia-l when an
american contributor calls someone a nazi (because they do) ?
No. There are places on projects to deal with those kind of situations
(even if they do not work properly imo).
As there are places on Commons to discuss about the scope, the way we
should handle copyright, etc. Nobody is preventing you to go to this
places
and start a discussion, share your thoughts and
your wishes.
To be clear: Wikimedia is not only ENWP. Other wikipedias and projects
are
using Commons every day. But the drama always
come from ENWP...
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Steven Walling <
steven.walling(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 12:40:09 PM Pipo Le Clown <pleclown(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I'm on the road every two
weekends, and processing pictures the rest
of
the
> time on my free time. I've provided around 8000 pictures to Commons,
and
> helped to have pictures for articles like
Cristiano Ronaldo, Roy
Hogdson
> or
> > Greig Laidlaw...
> >
> > Just to read that I'm a fascist and an "anal retentive" because
someone
>
proposed a fucking picture of KitKat for deletion ? It was not even
> deleted, the discussion is still going on. And even if it was, the
right
place to
go would have been COM:UDR, with a strong rationale, where
people
> would have discuss it in a civilised manner. Not in this echo
chamber...
>
> So yes, one could say that the thread "was accusatory from the start,
and
quickly
went to vicious". One could also say that this is a fucking
disgrace.
Pleclown
To be crystal clear: I didn't link to the DR or mention the nominator
because I don't actually care much about the individual instance.
Commons is going to do what it's going to do, and whomever nominated it
or
comments in support of deletion is just doing
what the policies of
Commons
is telling them to do.
The problem is a general one with the goals of Commons, what the
community
focuses (and doesn't focus on), as I said. I
think it should be clear
that
> the purpose of discussing it on Wikimedia-l as opposed to Commons is
talk
about
whether Commons is doing a good job of serving as the media
repository for other projects. Not about whether the nominator was
correct
> in this individual case or something like that.
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Austin Hair <adhair(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> >
> > > Okay, guys, let's all take a step back and remember
[[WP:Civility]].
> >
(Yeah, I know that's a Wikipedia pillar, but can't we all at least
get
> > on board with that one?)
> >
> > The tone of this thread was accusatory from the start, and quickly
> > went to vicious. Maybe everyone can try it again with a bit of AGF.
> >
> > Austin
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:30 PM, James Alexander <
jamesofur(a)gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> P.S. Stephen, you are young and handsome, in fact rather dishy
to
my
> > >> ageing eyes. Good for you.
Keep in mind that your fellow
volunteers
> > > >> might not have been born so lucky, and that being young and
pretty
all
> > >> too soon passes into memory, sigh.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Fæ, this is not acceptable for the list (or for that matter on
wiki).
> > > Stephen's neckbeard comment
certainly wasn't helpful either but
it's
> no
> > > > excuse.
> > > >
> > > > James
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=
unsubscribe>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=
unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/
GuidelinesWikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>