To be honest, i am a bit concerned about Matt Flaschen's conduct here:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Summary_of_critic… This is
not the behavior which i expect from a payed staffer.
Apart from that, i see a big COI - the staffer in question is voting at the voting
sections, striking out votes, defending the code of conduct and the he is marking a
section as "consensus". Imho the COI is obvious, such a behavior wouldn't be
possible at dewp or commons.
Best,
--Steinsplitter
________________________________
Von: Wikimedia-l <wikimedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> im Auftrag von Rogol
Domedonfors <domedonfors(a)gmail.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Februar 2017 08:32
An: Wikimedia Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Draft Code of Conduct for Technical Spaces
Yes. See
https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft&…
at section "Final approval of CoC", where Matt's statement at
https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft&…
is discussed.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Pine W <wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
now reneged on
previous agreements to hold a final vote
Has that actually happened? I'm hoping that no statement like "the total
document isn't subject to an RfC" was actually made. That would add
needless disagreement to a process that is challenging enough even in the
best of circumstances, and in any case would likely be overridden by the
community.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>