To be honest, i am a bit concerned about Matt Flaschen's conduct here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Summary_of_critici... This is not the behavior which i expect from a payed staffer.
Apart from that, i see a big COI - the staffer in question is voting at the voting sections, striking out votes, defending the code of conduct and the he is marking a section as "consensus". Imho the COI is obvious, such a behavior wouldn't be possible at dewp or commons.
Best,
--Steinsplitter
________________________________ Von: Wikimedia-l wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org im Auftrag von Rogol Domedonfors domedonfors@gmail.com Gesendet: Montag, 27. Februar 2017 08:32 An: Wikimedia Mailing List Betreff: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Draft Code of Conduct for Technical Spaces
Yes. See https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft&o... at section "Final approval of CoC", where Matt's statement at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft&o... is discussed.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
now reneged on previous agreements to hold a final vote
Has that actually happened? I'm hoping that no statement like "the total document isn't subject to an RfC" was actually made. That would add needless disagreement to a process that is challenging enough even in the best of circumstances, and in any case would likely be overridden by the community.
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe