I think it's relative (like everything, anyway)
When we were discussing about image filter I remember over one hundred-mails. It was a good discussion. It would be hilarious if someone speak ''Hey everybody, we exceed the thirty messages soft limit, let's end this discussion right now.'' :P
Some debates are big and the consensus doesn't come easy, what could we do? Suddenly stop?
A ''soft'' limit is always great, but in some cases is not applicable.
_____________________ MateusNobre Wikimedia Brasil - MetalBrasil on Wikimedia projects (+55) 85 88393509 30440865
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:55:26 +0100 From: dgerard@gmail.com To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] moderation soft limit
On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. jayen466@gmail.com wrote:
For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on English Wikipedia related to the board resolution on controversial content, which contains some further views and discussion. I have summarised my view that our illustrations, just like our texts, should follow good practice established in reliable sources here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Cas...
And the AC summarised theirs: 0 accept, 6 decline. As tends to happen when people go forum-shopping.
- d.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l