On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Matthew Brown<morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As opposed to you, who'd just love to destroy that
content to get money?
Destroy what content? Recall I used the terms "fetish" and other
destructive-sexuality / pro-depravity articles and images" and
referred to people who support their ubiquitous access as "pro-freedom
dogmatists." Granted there are light, grey, and also black areas
within the overall realm of what might loosely be called "sexuality,"
and we need to deal with most of them, but thats not to say we need to
deal with every destroyed se
x attached concept as if it were a ubiquitous part of any loving
relationship. Wikipedia is censored after all. The question then is
about scale and degree.
-Stevertigo