On 18 April 2013 12:07, Mathieu Stumpf <psychoslave(a)culture-libre.org>wrote;wrote:
Le 2013-04-18 14:56, Katie Chan a écrit :
On 18/04/2013 13:51, David Gerard wrote:
So far, it's apparently a gateway to advertising.
Mathieu, I'm not a huge advocate of Twitter buttons, and I think the
neutrality objection (do we favour a few services, or have 2000
buttons?) is a serious problem. But your arguments so far have been
absolutely terrible.
We already selectively choose which outside service we display when a
user click on say an ISBN number or geoip. Doing likewise for share
buttons wouldn't be something new....
Katie
I admit you have a point here. How were this services selected? Was it a
community process?
--
Association Culture-Libre
http://www.culture-libre.org/
______________________________**_________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.**org <Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l<https://lists…
--
Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
rodrigo.argenton(a)gmail.com
+55 11 979 718 884