On 7/21/06, Oldak Quill <oldakquill(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 21/07/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net>
wrote:
If you're not a lawyer why are you pushing
these legal interpretations?
Because that's what we're all doing. I don't think my conservative
interpretation of the law is dangerous in any way.
Saying that photos of 3D pd works do not carry copyright is not a
conservative interpretation. :)
The only reason that we hold the position that (in the US) photographs
of PD 2D works don't gain the photographers copyright is because of
Bridgeman v. Corel.