Hoi,
I have seen too many polls. I prefer arguments. Consider how many were
involved in the elections, how well do you think a poll would do ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7/18/07, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/18/07, Aphaia <aphaia(a)gmail.com> wrote:
<snippage>
As long as minimum subjective line of our
community member's
involvement sense matter, I think we don't need a new poll.
.
.
.
<snip>
.
.
.
As part of Election committee, I personally
think the requirements of
this year was reasonable, but review is always welcome, specially
based on census, poll or whatever.
Hmm. I am confused. Are you against a poll or for it?
--
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l