Hoi, I have seen too many polls. I prefer arguments. Consider how many were involved in the elections, how well do you think a poll would do ? Thanks, GerardM
On 7/18/07, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonavaro@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/18/07, Aphaia aphaia@gmail.com wrote:
<snippage>
As long as minimum subjective line of our community member's involvement sense matter, I think we don't need a new poll.
. . .
<snip> . . . > As part of Election committee, I personally think the requirements of > this year was reasonable, but review is always welcome, specially > based on census, poll or whatever.
Hmm. I am confused. Are you against a poll or for it?
-- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l