On 3/30/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Certainly. Have meta and enjoy it as a separate
community increasingly
unusable by any other, as is working so well for Commons, rather than
the service project it purports to be; just stop representing it as
such, because it simply isn't.
Am I right in feeling that a lot of your frustration here, David, is
that you feel that Meta and Commons were not supposed to be
'communities' at all? That they were supposed to be shared project
space and managed as such?
-Matt