NullC just informed me that we originally promised to link to the
official sites. I agree that we should not renege on that promise.
Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On 12/26/06, David Strauss
<david(a)fourkitchens.com> wrote:
It's not Virgin's choice. If they get to
dictate the nature of their
representation, it starts to border on advertising. I think we'll have
better credibility with the community if we link to an article.
True, and I doubt that they can dictate anything at this point. I
nevertheless think that it would be rather crass of us to not link to
them if we told them that we would do so when the matching donation
was arranged. (I have no idea if this was actually the case, though;
presumably Danny would know.)
In any case, there's still the issue of finding something suitable to
link to. The en: article on the group
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Group) is in pretty poor shape,
and the handful of other languages don't seem to be any better.