NullC just informed me that we originally promised to link to the official sites. I agree that we should not renege on that promise.
Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On 12/26/06, David Strauss david@fourkitchens.com wrote:
It's not Virgin's choice. If they get to dictate the nature of their representation, it starts to border on advertising. I think we'll have better credibility with the community if we link to an article.
True, and I doubt that they can dictate anything at this point. I nevertheless think that it would be rather crass of us to not link to them if we told them that we would do so when the matching donation was arranged. (I have no idea if this was actually the case, though; presumably Danny would know.)
In any case, there's still the issue of finding something suitable to link to. The en: article on the group (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Group) is in pretty poor shape, and the handful of other languages don't seem to be any better.