On 4/30/06, daniwo59@aol.com daniwo59@aol.com wrote:
Over the past few weeks, OTRS has seen quite a few messages concerning companies that are putting information about themselves onto Wikipedia for advertising purposes, insisting that it is their right to do this. An article in an online SEO (search engine optimization) magazine described how to mine wikipedia to get web traffic. We have had emails from such diverse groups as talent agencies (we will take the copyright off our own website, as long as it is included in Wikipedia), a Dominatrix, a vaporizer (I have no choice but to keep inserting my links on your site so as to fend off the competitors), and many others. In fact, this appears to be a growing trend in Wikipedia, as is evidenced by similar phone calls to the office (I did not write the article about my, my PR firm wrote it, and I paid them good money so you can't take it off). Shoppingtelly.uk has written that as long as we allow links to the BBC, they will insist on their "rights" to put links to their site on Wikipedia.
This is a worrying trend on the English Wikipedia which raises issues of POV, notability, and verifiability. Ironically, we do not allow paid advertising, but we are buckling when people use our site in order to get free advertising.
I do not know the solution to this problem--several have been raised, but in my mind none is completely satisfactory. I am simply posting this here in the hope that it will elicit discussion and, perhaps, a real policy decision to counter this worrying trend.
Danny
Are the current solutions failing? Do you have some examples of violations of Wikipedia policies which have remained in the encyclopedia for any significant amount of time before being removed?
It seems to be my take on things that while the phone calls might be annoying to you the rest is pretty well handled by the normal wiki processes, and will be best handled by improving those normal wiki processes. Closing down VFD so people have more time to focus on ensuring that the information in the wiki is NPOV and verifiable would probably increase the efficiency a lot too.
Anthony