Elisabeth Bauer wrote:
Dan Grey wrote:
I disagree - in setting this up I read every page
on meta related to
the Foundation. With the exception of the meta budget page (redundant
with the WMF wiki page - something that patently must not be edited),
everything people ever desire to know is on meta. It's just buried
under all the other (mostly abandoned) pages.
Think about what people want to know:
*Who runs the Foundation - the Board
*Where the money gets spent - the Budget
*Who does what - the Departments
*How does the place work (nerd pages) - the Servers
*Anything local to me? - the Chapters
*I'm a journalist - Press
As a journalist, you shouldn't be on Meta. Meta is the place for the
community, to work at wikimedia level. Not for public representation.
That's what
http://wikimediafoundation.org is for.
greetings,
elian
possibly, but community must also know how to join the press team or
where things should be handled. So a press page on meta can make sense,
WITH a huge mention on top telling journalists where to go.
This said, one of the pages I most often indicated to journalists on
meta, is the logo page, where they can download the high resolution logos.
Ant