On 10/17/06, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, because having math-tex code, which is fairly
difficult to grok,
has crippled projects to the point where they can't work. Oh, wait.
If editors don't understand something in an editing screen, they leave
it alone - it's generally not difficult at all to figure out which bit
you're looking at even if you don't comprehend the code.
There is a study floating around that suggests otherwise.
I don't see
why providing for extensions which will be quite rarely used, but
provide definite extra functionality, is a downside.
Yes, other projects will use it more than enwp. But that doesn't mean
that it won't be useful on enwp, or mean that it's somehow an
automatic detriment...
Keeping the edit code as simple as posible is important. In this case
I agree with the suggestion that this can be done through the use of
templates however this is an issue that should always be kept in mind.
--
geni