These seem like reasonable ideas, Teemu, and I don't in any way oppose
them. It sounds, however, like they would go through different channels at
WMF (such as the grants programs, and/or business partnerships) than the
Elsevier and JSTOR programs did. Nothing wrong with that, but I wanted to
be clear what it is we're talking about.
-Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]
On Feb 15, 2016 11:08 AM, "Leinonen Teemu" <teemu.leinonen(a)aalto.fi>
wrote:
On 15.2.2016,
at 18.07, Pete Forsyth <peteforsyth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Apart from brand affiliation, what do you see as a potential benefit from
partnering with PLoS?
I think brand affiliation would be a good start and could help PLoS, that
is not so well known as the Wikipedia.
I wouldn’t be agains giving PLoS some financially supported, too, because
they are like-minded non-profit organization with very similar mission as
we have (and I am saying this without knowing anything about their
financial situation).
- Teemu
--------------------------------------------------
Teemu Leinonen
http://teemuleinonen.fi
+358 50 351 6796
Media Lab
http://mlab.uiah.fi
Aalto University
School of Arts, Design and Architecture
--------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>