These seem like reasonable ideas, Teemu, and I don't in any way oppose them. It sounds, however, like they would go through different channels at WMF (such as the grants programs, and/or business partnerships) than the Elsevier and JSTOR programs did. Nothing wrong with that, but I wanted to be clear what it is we're talking about. -Pete [[User:Peteforsyth]] On Feb 15, 2016 11:08 AM, "Leinonen Teemu" teemu.leinonen@aalto.fi wrote:
On 15.2.2016, at 18.07, Pete Forsyth peteforsyth@gmail.com wrote: Apart from brand affiliation, what do you see as a potential benefit from partnering with PLoS?
I think brand affiliation would be a good start and could help PLoS, that is not so well known as the Wikipedia.
I wouldn’t be agains giving PLoS some financially supported, too, because they are like-minded non-profit organization with very similar mission as we have (and I am saying this without knowing anything about their financial situation).
- Teemu
Teemu Leinonen http://teemuleinonen.fi +358 50 351 6796 Media Lab http://mlab.uiah.fi Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe