But the evidence is clear that there was no wrongdoing
on my part.
Erik -
I haven't seen anyone accuse you of wrongdoing, only of pissing people
off. It feels as though the issue at hand is about handling loose
consensus with goodwill and a peaceful heart, more than it is about
following or breaking clearly-defined rules.
Early discussions and votes about wikinews were tactful - concerned
with consensus and discussion, not with empowering groups to act
unilaterally if they satisfied a set of conditions - and *very*
patient, and unarguably successful. So were you. I hope we can get
back there.
+sj+
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:03:32 +0100, Erik Moeller <erik_moeller(a)gmx.de> wrote:
Michael Snow wrote:
Yes, please do. Some of us
Who is "some"? Who is "us"?
> would very much like to know why this was so clear to you, based on
Please don't chafe at Michael. I wanted to know the same thing, until
you and Anthere clarified the matter. It is hard to know where you
are coming from when your are so combative.
+sj+