<checks the name of the mailing list>
Most wikipedias don't have an ArbCom[m].
SJ
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
On 3/31/07, Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Sebastian Moleski wrote:
It might be prudent to use the term
"jurisdiction" instead of country if
we're talking semantic details here. Shouldn't this discussion take place on
a talk page somewhere?
Weak agreement on this invocation of the Fear Of Law. Strong agreement
that this discussion should be on a wiki page; see
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:CheckUser_policy
Actually, as it's pointed in several places, that discussion is the
sole purview of the ArbCom (as long as they don't contradict the
global checkuser policy), not to the community.
I am generally loathe to use age as a barrier for anything; we should be
clear about where this line is being drawn, and for what reasons.
"This is a very important role" is not a reason to discriminate based on
age. "This is a role that requires being responsible" is likewise not
appropriate. "This is a role that requires being legally accountable for
one's actions" is...
SJ
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l