<checks the name of the mailing list>
Most wikipedias don't have an ArbCom[m].
SJ
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
On 3/31/07, Samuel Klein meta.sj@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Sebastian Moleski wrote:
It might be prudent to use the term "jurisdiction" instead of country if we're talking semantic details here. Shouldn't this discussion take place on a talk page somewhere?
Weak agreement on this invocation of the Fear Of Law. Strong agreement that this discussion should be on a wiki page; see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:CheckUser_policy
Actually, as it's pointed in several places, that discussion is the sole purview of the ArbCom (as long as they don't contradict the global checkuser policy), not to the community.
I am generally loathe to use age as a barrier for anything; we should be clear about where this line is being drawn, and for what reasons.
"This is a very important role" is not a reason to discriminate based on age. "This is a role that requires being responsible" is likewise not appropriate. "This is a role that requires being legally accountable for one's actions" is...
SJ
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l