Дана Sunday 17 January 2010 22:13:28 private musings написа:
Here's another concerning aspect of management of
explicit media on WMF;
It's been asserted that images of a 16 year old girl masturbating have been
uploaded to commons;
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_notic
eboard/Incidents&oldid=338426080#User:Misty_Willows_problematic_images The
image in question has been deleted from commons;
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Closeup_of_female_mastu
rbation_pastel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 ..and I think it's also been
oversighted. Lar, a commons oversighter, muses over on wikipedia review
whether or not continuing to fight fires caused by systemic problems is the
right thing to do;
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28221&view=findpo…
072 The general issue is of course important, but I hope in the short term,
that the image in question can be properly deleted - restricting it to
oversighters only remains, in my view, likely to be illegal - it really
would be best for that image to be removed by a dev.
Maybe this is underway as I type? Hope so!
This is an interesting case, but I don't see what it has to do with policies
on explicit images on WMF projects. Even if the policies would be changed to
be the strictest possible (for example, no explicit images allowed at all),
the exact same thing could happen.