Could someone, just for the benefit of this (relative) outsider and
journalist, explain what the basic objections are to AdSense type ads on
Wikipedia? I know you'll be speaking for yourself and not the community,
and will read the explanations accordingly.
Best, MP
Marshall Poe, Ph.D.
The Atlantic Monthly
600 New Hampshire Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20037
202-266-6511
mpoe(a)theatlantic.com
-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces(a)wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces@wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Dan Grey
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 7:41 AM
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Benefits of advertising (was Our
exponentiallyincreasing costs)
On 27/10/05, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>The relatively small number of editors who will
throw a hissy-fit off
won't be
missed - new editors arrive all the time, and many
eventually crawl back after a public foot-stomping session anyway.
A full one-third of that hard core sufficiently dedicated to Wikipedia
to spend their own scarce cash going all the way to
Wikimania 2005,
wasn't it? Something about that doesn't sound "insignificant" to me.
Maybe it does to you.
I think you're under-estimating the total number of editors WP has,
over-estimating who'd leave, and over-valuing their importance.
Where'd you get that figure from anyway?
Dan
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l