Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
You are using terminology that makes what you say absolutely not the same.
It is explicitly said that a person with check user rights has these rights
as a member of a community. You express that this same person is part of the
Foundation. This is not what gives him the ability to wield the specialised
tools to gain private information. So I disagree we say the same thing; you
are overly broad and wrong as a consequence.
Now you may have meant to say this, and in your later reply there are
indications that you do, but the opposite was obvious to me and consequently
my reaction. I think we agree that check user is a right given by a
community, not the Foundation.
Thanks,
GerardM
I don't tend to phrase things in a way that could be
parsed as an offfensive way, and I definitely don't
want you to read this that way, if you are able...
But, jesus!!
I fail at wordÅ› here, in not being able to even compass
what your problem is. Come on, my god, whatever people
do, there has to be a point where people just say, yes, you
just went past the pale...
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen