On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Rjd0060<rjd0060.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Gregory Maxwell
<gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Philippe
Beaudette<pbeaudette(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Earlier today a number of adjustments were made
to votes which had
been previously struck in the election for Wikimedia Board of
Trustees. We believe the votes that are still struck are validly
struck; if there is a dispute, any user is encouraged to contact the
Election Committee (board-elections(a)lists.wikimedia.org) or any member
personally for clarification.
Is there any reason why some, but not all, super-seeded votes have
also been struck?
There are a number of cases, but picking one I know personally,
<strike>Details 15:49, 28 July 2009 Ragesoss
en.wikipedia.org
</strike>
Details 14:06, 9 August 2009 Ragesoss
en.wikipedia.org
Yeah, I noticed this quite a bit also. If a voter voted more that once, it
seems like all but their last vote is greyed out usually - only sometimes
are first votes struck. Not sure if second/third/etc. votes need to be
struck just because the user voted again or not, based on that.
What happened with my vote, which Phoebe noticed and brought to both
my and the election committee's attention, is that my first vote was
initially struck out without being superseded. Phoebe and I
speculated that this might have been because I accessed the voting
page again without casting a second vote (and then, yesterday,
accessed it a third time and voted a second time).
-Sage