On 7/10/07, Brion Vibber <brion(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Casey Brown wrote:
Just for the record, we are doing State-based
chapters at the request of the
Chapters Committee. We had originally wanted a regional committee, but
ChapComm strongly suggested simply a state organization (and who were we to
argue? :P).
Hmm, I'd tend to agree with the sentiment that regional / metro-based
chapters make more sense than state chapters, especially if the idea is
to organize local activity. We already have US legal infrastructure in
WMF, and there'll be more benefit in local organizing by keeping groups,
well, local.
Miami and Tallahassee, or Los Angeles and San Francisco, or Philly and
Pittsburgh, don't seem like super-convenient pairings to me.
What's the argument in favor of state-level blocks?
I agree with Brion here. Unless there is a pressing need, one should
go with a proven model with other organizations.
When I was a board member of a nonprofit regional member organization,
everything was broken down into metropolitan areas first. In places
without that center of gravity, it was state based. So the obvious
metro aras are NYC, LA, SF, DC, Chicago, New England, Philly/NJ/DE,
Atlanta, San Diego, etc. You could almost imagine it by sports team
classification, since the need is similar to facilitate a physical
gathering and local interest. For an example, see:
http://tinyurl.com/33xrz7
Let's talk, but if we can learn from experience and other successes,
let's do so.
-Andrew