prevented you of using the data?
And from which different perspectives?
Cheers,
Micru
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Anders Wennersten <
mail(a)anderswennersten.se
wrote:
we have now spent one year trying to use Wikidata operationally, in our
botprojects, but found it is impossible in the state it is now, from many
perspectives. It has been a big disappointment but we hope it will look
better a year from now
Anders
Gerard Meijssen skrev 2014-06-16 12:44:
Hoi,
> I blogged about Lsjbot.. [1]. I really hope that a lot of attention is
> given in finding the links to existing items in Wikidata.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> [1]
>
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2014/06/wikipedia-
> to-bot-or-not-to-bot.html
>
>
> On 16 June 2014 12:25, Anders Wennersten <mail(a)anderswennersten.se>
> wrote:
>
> After having changed job and residence Sverker is now on it again.
> This
>
>> time Lsjbot will generate some 300 000 articles on plant species. The
>> initiative is now receiving full support and even enthusiasm from the
>> fellow wikipedians on svwp
>>
>> It is now close to one year since the 1M article on insects, animal etc
>> was generated and we now have had some feedback whereof I here give
>> some
>> examples
>> *The students on a university veterinary course was given the
>> assignment
>> to write article on parasitic worms and put them up om Wikipedia. These
>> became excellent: complete and voluminous. This was in many way
>> helped/made
>> possible by that there already existed Lsjbot stubs with complete
>> Taxobox,
>> iw-links, categories and basic sources. The students are expert on
>> subjects
>> not the wikispecialities
>> *the experts on animal etc among our Wikipedians has now shifted focus.
>> There are species where the authorities disagree on the taxonomy and
>> here
>> Lsjbot did not generate any article. among birds there are some 500
>> disputed species. These articles our experts now work with,
>> highlighting
>> the disputes, why, what and by whom. And when we compare these
>> manually
>> created articles we find that on most other language versions, these
>> only
>> take data from one authority and are not correctly describing the
>> dispute.
>> Perhaps svwp will after this not only be most complete but also most
>> correct version on species?
>>
>> As a side effect (not a goal in itself) we expect svwp to be the second
>> biggest version, when it comes to number of articles, by
>> August/September
>>
>> And when it comes to botgeneration in general, we are continuing our
>> researcheffort into generate some 0,3-0,5 M articles on geographic
>> entities
>> from all over the world by end 2015/2016 using Wikidata as a source.
>>
>> Anders
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>