Actually, I think it's more about the naming names, accusations (whether true or not, I wouldn't know; I never look in to those), and some of the rather vivid imagery that is sometimes served up with those names. I don't remember seeing a lot of that stuff coming from you, edward, but it would be disingenuous to suggest that there isn't more of that there than here.
As I mentioned earlier, however, they are very different forums with only some overlapping purpose in discussing general WP issues. IMO there's little to be gained out of comparing the two and everything to be gained out of elevating the nature of discourse for each according to its own purpose.
,Wil
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:38 AM, edward edward@logicmuseum.com wrote:
On Fri May 23 23:06:32 UTC 2014 Wil Sinclair wrote: The trash talk. . . Most of the concerns I've heard about WO involve the snarky, personal comments that are front and center in the forums.
On Sat May 24 21:33:07 UTC 2014 David Gerard wrote: It's a festering pit of spammers, trolls and nutters, and is a net negative in just about every way.