Actually, I think it's more about the naming names, accusations
(whether true or not, I wouldn't know; I never look in to those), and
some of the rather vivid imagery that is sometimes served up with
those names. I don't remember seeing a lot of that stuff coming from
you, edward, but it would be disingenuous to suggest that there isn't
more of that there than here.
As I mentioned earlier, however, they are very different forums with
only some overlapping purpose in discussing general WP issues. IMO
there's little to be gained out of comparing the two and everything to
be gained out of elevating the nature of discourse for each according
to its own purpose.
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:38 AM, edward <edward(a)logicmuseum.com> wrote:
On Fri May 23 23:06:32 UTC 2014 Wil Sinclair wrote:
The trash talk. . . Most of the concerns I've heard about WO involve
the snarky, personal comments that are front and center in the forums.
On Sat May 24 21:33:07 UTC 2014 David Gerard wrote:
It's a festering pit of spammers, trolls and nutters, and is a net negative
in just about every way.