2009/2/18 Michael Snow <wikipedia(a)verizon.net>et>:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/2/18 Michael Snow
That's why we made it a point to include some
attribution standards in
the proposal, so that we don't vote on this in a vacuum.
I don't believe I've seen a formal proposal yet - did I miss it?
There's the licensing update page on Meta, currently marked as a draft.
I'm not sure what you were looking for, but feel free to approach that
as the proposal, it's what we've been discussing all along, I believe.
We'll probably take off the "draft" status at some point, but there are
tradeoffs between formality and retaining the ability to address and
incorporate feedback before we vote.
Oh, yes, there is that draft. Obviously, the point at which you take
off the "draft" needs to be before the vote - which needs to be sooner
rather than later if we're going to have a definite result in time
(the Foundation is registered in Florida, after all! ;)).
Incidentally, what contact have you had with CC about how they
interpret the license? Particularly regarding the "attribution by