On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
<cimonavaro(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Surely there is a significant difference between
an updated version of
the
same license, and a license which says the work
can be relicensed under a
different license.
Define "same license". It really seems to me you want to
define a license as being different if it changes something
you don't like.
In this context, for a license to be the "same license" as the GFDL, it
would need to be called "GFDL X.Y" and be published by the FSF.
I think that says it all. If that is what you really want,
good day to you, sir.
The torturous logic can't
disguise that the license has been GFDL from the git-go
and is not departing from that license against the prime
guardian of that license. That is the bare fact.
Huh?