Thanks Mark and Mike
Mike, well done on finding the "About"! I looked for it and could not find it.
But surely saying that "Most of the contents are licensed under CC-BY-SAhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/" is not a licence to copy the entire Wikipedia wholesale, without as much as a mention thereof?
Is there a mechanism to deal with this sort of thing? Where can I refer it to for action?
Regards,
Rui
On 3 August 2012 14:23, Mike Dupont jamesmikedupont@googlemail.com wrote:
on the copyright page they say that the content is mostly cc-by-sa http://en.goldenmap.com/stylesheets/terms.php
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
It looks like a direct scrape, even to the extent of having some internal links being broken because they didn't update them (e.g. the link to Wikimedia Commons at the end of the article). I believe it's just one of
the
(many) unauthorized mirrors that don't properly credit the source of
their
content.
The English Wikipedia keeps track of such sites here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CC-BY-SA_Compliance
-Mark
On 8/3/12 1:44 PM, Rui Correia wrote:
Dear All
I came across a site called Golden Map, which has an encyclopaedic collection of articles that are the same as in the Wikipedia, but I
don't
see anywhere any information expalining what the association/ permission is. Is there an agreement in place for this?
Look - for example - at this page on the Wildebeest http://en.goldenmap.com/Wildebeest
Best regards,
Rui
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
-- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l