On Aug 10, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Kirill Lokshin <kirill.lokshin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:51 PM,
<Birgitte_sb(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
I don't think chapters are being cut off I
think they are being
centralized. Centralization, not lack of funding, is what I believe will
make chapters ineffective. Frankly, I think cutting off their funding would
be less detrimental (although still not a good thing) to the chapter's
long-term effectiveness than centralizing them into a grant program. It
would be worse for the near-term, but many would still recover from it as
owner-led organizations funded locally outside of the WMF banner campaign.
Perhaps I'm missing something, but where has it been suggested that chapters
would not remain free to raise funds independently of the WMF? My
impression was that the change being discussed here would merely remove
participation in the WMF fundraiser as a funding source and replace it with
direct WMF grants; presumably chapters could seek funding elsewhere?
I don't see why such a thing wouldn't be possible, but I don't find it very
likely. I am looking mostly at the incentives each structure produces. As the proposal
seems to be funding the WMF approved operating budget of a chapter with a WMF grant, I
don' t think the general rule will be an organization that is locally funded. Do you
find it otherwise?
BirgitteSB