On 10/16/06, Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
On 10/16/06, Birgitte SB
<birgitte_sb(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
> I will not pretend to really understand this
stuff.
> However Wikitex uses Lillypond and brion has
marked
> Lillypond "wontfix" because it is
inherently
unsafe.
> But if the Wikitex thing is really something
different
please
forgive my confusion.
The current status, as I understand it, is that
Peter Danenberg is
coming up with a new security model for WikiTeX.
He has tentatively
stated that he wants to be done by December 1.
Then the WMF tech team
can take another stab at reviewing it (and its
components) for
integration.
As you know, I strongly believe we need this and
other extension-based
functionality; we just need a general security
model for it that makes
sense.
While this might be useful on wikisource on en it
would have the
problem of making the code shown on the editing
pages even more
incomprehensible.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
I am unsure what you mean here. The code will look
the same at en.WS as it does at en.WP. It will only
show up where there is a need to display music. Many
editors will never come across thes edit screens at
all. However much of a learning curve there is with
this code it will be more efficient than cropping
images from book scans. I don't understand what you
are advocating here.
Birgitte SB
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around