On 10/04/11 3:14 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
WereSpielChequers, 04/10/2011 23:46:
If someone tried to use this law
to
force an editor to publish a rebuttal of something posted before the
freeze, then surely that would be retrospective legislation?
I don't see why.
Web pages are permanent, they ask the
correction/declaration to be published after the new law (there's no
time limit for it) and you have to publish it. You're not punished for
having published the original text.
And, of course, if someone has forced the site to publish its POV
version, someone with an opposing POV must have the same right.
Ray