On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
A further argument against having this principally discussed on Meta is that those who are best served by Simple do not have the language skills to participate fully in a discussion where there is unlimited use of language.
Ec
That would be just as true for a project in any other language but standard English. What you're saying is that Meta isn't perfect - which is true. Do you have a better alternative?
The question of how such a discussion would be closed is what concerns me the most - I can't see allowing a meta bureaucrat to close such a poll (which is what we would do in en.wp), and since the Foundation would have to make the changes anyway... Would it be interpreted, then, by a developer?
Nathan