On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
A further argument against having this principally discussed on Meta is
that those who are best served by Simple do not have the language skills
to participate fully in a discussion where there is unlimited use of
That would be just as true for a project in any other language but standard
English. What you're saying is that Meta isn't perfect - which is true. Do
you have a better alternative?
The question of how such a discussion would be closed is what concerns me
the most - I can't see allowing a meta bureaucrat to close such a poll
(which is what we would do in en.wp), and since the Foundation would have to
make the changes anyway... Would it be interpreted, then, by a developer?