On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 08:17:06PM -0800, phoebe ayers wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:05 AM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12 November 2010 17:34, Anthony
<wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
These are all questions which would have to be
answered before WMF
should even consider getting involved. ?To cover itself legally it
should have the agreement of Larry Sanger, the Tides Center, and at
least a majority of the Management Counsel
(
http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Management_Council).
This would be WMF just providing ISP services for free, no more liable
than Slicehost presently are.
You know what would be kind of awesome? If there was a neutral hosting
service -- by which I mean neutral hosting and technical support
service -- for a whole variety of small free content projects that
don't truly have the capacity to run independent technical
organizations but are otherwise fairly stable. We've seen two such
organizations brought up on Foundation-l just this year -- the
fanhistory wiki and now Citizendium -- both of which need stable
hosting, people who understand MediaWiki, and maybe even a bit of an
organizational platform (like fundraising support) too. This platform
could be a hosting service that was geared towards free and
participatory projects, the upstart free content of the web.
Such a hosting service would be a commons approach to this problem,
with the costs and burden shared not just among the small projects but
perhaps among the big ones too: I can see the big free culture
organizations (us, Mozilla, Creative Commons, etc.) pitching in to
such a thing in order to have a space to direct small projects to.
This would be different from wiki hosting because perhaps all the
projects wouldn't even be a wiki, as we understand them now; and there
would be room for Citizendium's funky branch of MediaWiki and every
other hack you can think of. And it would be neutral ground: not
necessarily tied to the values of our Foundation or anyone else's.
What do you think? Does such a thing exist already? Would it work?
Phoebe: Maybe I'll do it. I've been working out costs for running
virtual servers and cloud services in spreadsheets (and I
have one virtual host running live).
Now that I've got a small, self sustaining pilot running, I'm not
entirely sure what to *do* with the remaining capacity. It's turning out
to be a solution looking for a problem.
Now your suggestion looks like a problem looking for a solution. ;-)
In fact I've already started doing some hosting for oss/wiki type folks
on my (ostensibly commercial) system as things stand now. With a
little help from a cloud-type-person from fedora project (BCCed), I
should be able to scale up as needed.
Scaling up *would* require some sort of financial committments from
people using the system. But that would be (considerably!) less than
Eur100/month (depending on requirements). People who can afford to pay
a little would effectively support those who can't afford to pay.
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
--
[Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attachment]
gpg (
www.gnupg.org) Fingerprint for key FEF9DD72
5ED6 E215 73EE AD84 E03A 01C5 94AC 7B0E FEF9 DD72