On Thu, 05 May 2005 16:04:31 +0200, Andre Engels wrote:
as Angela says, if we can get it under PD (or CC-BY,
CC-SA, CC-BY-SA,
GNU/FDL, GPL or another license not significantly stricter than GNU/FDL),
there is no reason to restrict it further.
No question about it, this case is simple: of course there's no reason
for adopting a non-commercial licence for the content that we can get under PD.
And about some next time, when we can't: it was my understanding that Wikimedia
would not consider non-commercial licences as a rule, not on a case-by-case basis.
I feel Angela's mail has confirmed this.
[[m:user:tsca]]