Let's just cut to the point; it's pretty much the same reason we don't abbreviate as wiki; just thinking about somebody calling Wikipedia "the Wikipedia" makes my head hurt... --Unionhawk
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael Snow wikipedia@verizon.netwrote:
Ziko van Dijk wrote:
Hello, Could someone explain to me why "Wikipedia" is without definite article? In English you say "the Britannica", so why not "the Wikipedia"? I am wondering that also in German Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians tend to drop the article, although we say "der Brockhaus".
Actually, singular proper nouns commonly do not take the definite article in English. I would not say "the Britannica" anymore than I would say "the Wikipedia" (or, as noted, "the Encarta"). This particular case may indicate a difference between British and American English here, I'm guessing from the other comments.
There are some situations where you would use the definite article for singular proper nouns, such as with some geographical names, or when the name is actually a combination of common and proper nouns. Thus, I might refer to "the Encyclopedia Britannica" because it's "the encyclopedia" and "Britannica" identifies which encyclopedia I mean.
--Michael Snow
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l