2008/8/3 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hoi,
That would be premature and given the broad base of support that it is
looking for, it is a bad idea for this as well. Some people complain and say
that Foundation-l does not cover enough relevant facts.. the best way of
countering this argument is by having subjects like the Volunteer Council
remain on this list.
I just noticed that there already is a relatively dormant "Meta" mailing list:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediameta-l
There might be some value in having "community self-organization"
discussions explicitly on that list, because foundation-l suggests
that it's specifically about the Wikimedia Foundation, and that it is
less inclusive of the chapters and the broader Wikimedia movement. As
has been expressed here a few times, the Wikimedia Foundation as an
organizational entity should not have to approve or bless community
self-organization efforts, and a separate list might help to reinforce
that concept.
--
Erik Möller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation
Support Free Knowledge:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate