If the Foundation Endowment paid for translations of articles across Wikipedias, it would still be like a Foundation Grant in terms of the legal effect on the DMCA safe harbor provisions and the practical effect on whether mistakes could bring the Foundation into disrepute.
Maybe the Foundation could pay for translations, as long as a much smaller independent third party was reviewing them for fidelity and freedom from bias under conditions where a group of people are trying to confound the paid reviewers by including a constant but small proportion of intentionally inaccurate and biased proposed translations to make sure that the reviewer quality is sufficient.
If that doesn't work, then the independent third party anti-bias QA organization could grow to do the translation, perhaps as a thematic organization supported by both outside and less than half internal Foundation grants.
Best regards, Jim
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 2:53 AM, WereSpielChequers werespielchequers@gmail.com wrote:
Pine, there is one possible way to fund such translation in the future; The Foundation is building up an endowment. When that endowment has grown to the point where the annual return is sufficient to fund the Foundation, then you could re-purpose the annual fundraiser from collecting money to host Wikipedia, to collecting money to make Wikipedia available in other languages.
If I'm correct in thinking that part of the problem for many of our widely spoken languages with weak wikipedias is that the more educated people who speak those languages are more likely to contribute edits in what is to them a higher status or more language or one more useful to their career, then maybe we should test using fundraiser type advertising to ask our English readers in places like India to translate articles from English to Indic languages.
In some parts of the world where incomes are generally very low and financial donations reflect that perhaps we have little to lose by shifting now from asking for funds to asking for content donations, especially in the language of that area.
WereSpielChequers
Message: 2 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 18:13:38 -0800 From: Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Paid translation Message-ID: <CAF=dyJhxBXyhmMPvDYWA4oPGuj3mOTjQ1bP5QQKhGE3U2tDFcA@mail. gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On the subject of paid translation, I could imagine this being included in the scope of work for a "Wiki Community Foundation" or "Wiki Content Foundation" that would do work that WMF doesn't do and/or shouldn't do. I have a number of activities in mind for this kind of organization. Unfortunately, I do not know how to fund it. I think that this organization should get most of its funding from non-WMF sources, and WMF has such strong fundraising capabilities that I think that competing with WMF for funding from readers and grant-making organizations would be very difficult. If WMF would like to have conversations about how the community could raise funds directly from readers and non-WMF foundations, I for one would be very interested in having that conversation.
Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe